Account services

Detailed criteria for scoring

| LRTAP data | NEC data | UNFCCC data | EU GHG data | EoI data | Air quality questionnaire | Monthly and summer ozone data | Designated areas | River quality | Lake quality | Groundwater quality | Water quantity | Marine data | Near real-time ozone data | European Pollutant Transfer Register | Water emission quality |

AE1: LRTAP data

Scoring criteria are based on completeness of time series of requested pollutants (SO2, NOx, CO, NMVOC, NH3, PM10) included in national submission under the UNECE Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution (LRTAP). It is critical for the Eionet priority data flow that a copy of the national submission is made available promptly in the agreed national data repository using requested electronic format according to the template (see letter to Eionet).
GoodGoodGood Complete time series available for all requested pollutants SO2, NOx, CO, NMVOC, NH3 (at least 1990-2009) and PM10 (at least 2000-2009) by 15 February 2011.
GoodGood Data available on time (by 15 February 2011).
Good Data delivered after 15 February 2011.
Poor No delivery available.
European datasets Air emissions data published through EEA Data Service
Air pollutant emissions (LRTAP) data viewer in EEA Data Service
Related indicators EEA core set of indicators:
  • CSI 001 Emissions of acidifying substances
  • CSI 002 Emissions of ozone precursors
  • CSI 003 Emissions of primary particles and secondary particulate precursors
Other air pollution indicators on EEA website.
Data deliveries Data uploaded to the Central Data Repository

AE1b: NEC data

Scoring criteria based on timeliness of reporting on the emissions of SO2, NOx, NMVOC and NH3 during 2008 and 2009 plus projections for 2010 as required by the National Emission Ceilings Directive 2001/81/EC. The directive requires reporting according to the template. Countries have been requested to post their deliveries in the Central Data Repository (see letter to Eionet).
GoodGoodGood NEC data available in CDR by 31 December 2010 and in the format specified and without modifications to the reporting template.
GoodGood NEC data delivered in time (by 31 December 2010).
Good NEC data delivered after 31 December 2010.
Poor No NEC data delivered.
European datasets National Emission Ceilings Directive Inventory in EEA Data Service
Air pollutant emissions (NEC Directive) data viewer in EEA Data Service
Related indicators EEA core set of indicators:
  • CSI 001 Emissions of acidifying substances
  • CSI 002 Emissions of ozone precursors
  • CSI 003 Emissions of primary particles and secondary particulate precursors
Other air pollution indicators on EEA website.
Data deliveries Data uploaded to the Central Data Repository

AE2: UNFCCC data

Scoring criteria based on completeness of time series of requested pollutants. It is critical for the Eionet priority data flow that a copy of the national submission to UNFCCC is made available electronically and in good time in agreed national data repository (see letter to Eionet).
GoodGoodGood Complete time series made available from 1990 to 2009 for all pollutants requested by data flow project: CO2, CH4, N2O, HFC, PFC and SF6 made available in specified XML format by 15 April 2011.
GoodGood Data in XML format available on time (by 15 April 2011).
Good Data delivered with delay (after 15 April 2011) or not in XML format.
Poor No delivery available.
European datasets Greenhouse gas emissions data published through EEA Data Service
Greenhouse gas emissions data viewer in EEA Data Service
Related indicators EEA core set of indicators:
  • CSI 002 Emissions of ozone precursors
  • CSI 010 Greenhouse gas emissions and removals
Greenhouse gas country profiles
Data deliveries Data uploaded to the Central Data Repository

AE2b: EU GHG data

Scoring criteria based on timeliness of reporting on the emissions of greenhouse gases and preliminary inventory report as required by the Greenhouse gas monitoring mechanism 280/2004/EC. The directive requires reporting according to the implementing provisions (2005/166/EC). Countries have been requested to post their deliveries in the Central Data Repository (see letter to Eionet).
GoodGoodGood Greenhouse Gas Monitoring Mechanism (EU GHG MM) data and preliminary inventory report delivered in time (by 15 January 2011) including all requested gases and in the specified XML format.
GoodGood GHG data delivered in time and in the specified XML format (by 15 January 2011).
Good GHG data delivered with delay (15-31 January 2011) or not in the specified XML format.
Poor No GHG data delivered or significantly delayed (after 31 January 2011).
European datasets Greenhouse gas emissions data published through EEA Data Service
Greenhouse gas emissions data viewer in EEA Data Service
Related indicators EEA core set of indicators:
  • CSI 002 Emissions of ozone precursors
  • CSI 010 Greenhouse gas emissions and removals
Greenhouse gas country profiles.
Data deliveries Data uploaded to the Central Data Repository

AQ1: EoI data

Scoring criteria based on timeliness of reporting under the Exchange of Information Decision 97/101/EC (amended by Commission Decision 2001/752/EC) and availability of data for particulate matter.
GoodGoodGood 2009 data delivered in time and includes particulate matter (Black Smoke, TSP, PM10, PM2.5, PM1.0).
GoodGood 2009 data delivered in time (not later than 1 October 2010).
Good Delivery available but not meeting criteria for content and/or timeliness.
Poor No delivery available.
European datasets AirBase data published through EEA Data Service
Map viewer for AirBase data.
Related indicators EEA core set of indicators:
  • CSI 004 Exceedance of air quality limit values in urban areas
  • CSI 005 Exposure of ecosystems to acidification, eutrophication and ozone
Data deliveries Data uploaded to the Central Data Repository

AQ2: Air quality questionnaire

Scoring is based on reporting of information on exceedances or non-exceedances in zones and agglomerations for all pollutants required to be reported through the annual questionnaire (2004/461/EC) by the daughter directives of the Air Quality Framework Directive (1999/30/EC: sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide and oxides of nitrogen, particulate matter and lead; 2000/69/EC: benzene and carbon monoxide; 2002/3/EC: ozone). Digital boundary information for the zones and agglomerations is also required where zone boundaries have changed or where zone boundaries were not previously available so that a European overview can be produced. Participation in the 2010 data flow is voluntary for countries which are not EU Member States.
GoodGoodGood Annual air quality in zones and agglomerations for 2009 for all required pollutants delivered in CDR using the questionnaire by 30 September 2010 and boundary information supplied for all reported zones and agglomerations and requested metadata provided for at least 95 % of reported stations.
GoodGood Annual air quality in zones and agglomerations for 2009 for all required pollutants delivered in CDR using the questionnaire by 30 September 2010 and boundary information supplied for all reported zones and agglomerations.
Good Information delivered but not meeting the criteria relating to timeliness, number of pollutants, boundary information or station metadata.
Poor No information delivered.
European datasets Zones in relation to EU air quality thresholds published through EEA Data Service
Map viewer for air quality zones
Regular products Annually published DG Environment list of zones in the EU Member States in relation to air quality thresholds
Data deliveries Data uploaded to the Central Data Repository

AQ2b: Monthly and summer ozone data

Scoring is based on reporting of provisional information about exceedances during the summer period of the current year according to Directive 2002/3/EC relating to ozone in ambient air: articles 10.2.a.i and 10.2.a.ii.
The criteria relate to the timeliness of reporting in CDR and the provision of station metadata needed for mapping and analysis. The EoI station code is sufficient if the metadata has been reported previously under EoI (Exchange of Information Decision 97/101/EC amended by Commission Decision 2001/752/EC) and an agreed EoI code has been allocated.
GoodGoodGood Information on exceedances provided in CDR before the end of the following calendar month for each month from April to September. Additional information about the summer delivered in CDR by 31 October 2010 and metadata on station location and type provided for at least 95 % of reported stations.
GoodGood Information on exceedances provided for all the months from April to September. The report with additional information about the summer delivered after 31 October 2010 or metadata on station location and type not available for at least 95 % of reported stations.
Good Information delivered but it does not meet the criteria relating to timeliness and/or completeness.
Poor No 2010 data delivered.
European datasets Ozone exceedances
Regular products Annually published EEA reports on summer ozone exceedances
Data deliveries Data uploaded to the Central Data Repository

CDDA1: Designated areas

Evaluation and scoring criteria for the CDDA are unchanged from previous years. See message to Eionet. The criteria are based on the timeliness and quality of the data made available in the agreed national data repository. Correctly reported spatial data with the appropriate attributes allows EEA to use CDDA in combination with other European data sets when making assessments. The information on IUCN1 categories is also a key attribute in the World Data Base on Protected Areas.
GoodGoodGood Designated areas made available by 15 March 2011 and at least 95 % of the nationally designated areas reported have the required attributes: centre co-ordinates, size of area and valid IUCN category and valid designation category. In addition: correctly reported digital boundaries have been made available for at least 75 % of the reported nationally designated areas that have an area greater than 1 hectare (priority should be given to the largest areas).
GoodGood Designated areas made available by 15 March 2011 and at least 66 % of the nationally designated areas made available have the required attributes: centre co-ordinates, size of area and valid IUCN category and valid designation category. In addition to the above: correctly reported digital boundaries have been made available for at least 50 % of the reported nationally designated areas that have an area greater than 1 hectare (priority should be given to the largest areas).
Good Designated areas made available and at least 30 % of the nationally designated areas made available have the required attributes: centre co-ordinates, size of area, valid IUCN category and valid designation category.
Poor No data made available or less than 30 % of the nationally designated areas reported have the required attributes.
European datasets Nationally designated areas data published through EEA data service.
Related indicators EEA core set of indicators: CSI 008 Designated areas
Data deliveries Data uploaded to the Central Data Repository
1 IUCN stands for International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources.
The 2008 guidance document on IUCN categories is available at: http://data.iucn.org/dbtw-wpd/edocs/PAPS-016.pdf.

EWN1: River quality

Scoring criteria are based on data deliveries for the current year and are focusing on the provision of quality data for preferred SoE nutrients and physical characteristics of monitoring stations.
Further criteria, important for achieving the maximum score, are the timeliness of the delivery, the provision of hazardous substances data, long time series of quality data for preferred SoE nutrients and data on proxy pressures and the response of a country to data validation questions.
GoodGoodGood 1. Timely data delivery to national repository and country feedback to reported data issues, and
2. Delivery of river monitoring stations with coordinates (if not delivered in the past years), and
3. Delivery of data for all 5 preferred SoE nutrients (BOD5 or BOD7, Total Ammonium/Ammonium, Total Phosphorus, Orthophosphate, Nitrate/Total Oxidised Nitrogen), and
4a. Delivery of hazardous substances data and especially from Preferred SoE Hazardous Substances list, or
4b. Delivery of proxy pressures data for all reported monitoring stations (if not delivered in the past years) and available time series for preferred SoE nutrients data are long at least 5 years if continuous, or 10 years if broken.
GoodGood 1. Timely data delivery to national repository and country feedback to reported data issues, and
2. Delivery of river monitoring stations with coordinates (if not delivered in the past years), and
3. Delivery of data for at least 3 of 5 preferred SoE nutrients (BOD5 or BOD7, Total Ammonium/Ammonium, Total Phosphorus, Orthophosphate, Nitrate/Total Oxidised Nitrogen)
Good Delayed delivery under WISE-SoE data collection 2010 but data provided in requested format, or
Timely data delivery, but provided data do not meet the above mentioned requirements for obtaining a higher score.
Poor No data delivery under WISE-SoE data collection 2010, no communication, or
Data could not be processed because not delivered in a requested format or not following basic quality criteria or delivered after data processing period.
European datasets Waterbase data published through EEA data service
Related indicators EEA core set of indicators:
  • CSI 019 Oxygen consuming substances in rivers
  • CSI 020 Nutrients in freshwater
Other water indicators on EEA website.
Data deliveries Data uploaded to the Central Data Repository

EWN2: Lake quality

Scoring criteria are based on data deliveries for the current year and are focusing on the provision of quality data for preferred SoE nutrients and physical characteristics of monitoring stations.
Further criteria, important for achieving the maximum score, are the timeliness of the delivery, the provision of hazardous substances data, long time series of quality data for preferred SoE nutrients and data on proxy pressures and the response of a country to data validation questions.
GoodGoodGood 1. Timely data delivery to national repository and country feedback to reported data issues, and
2. Delivery of lake monitoring stations (sampling sites) with coordinates (if not delivered in the past years), and
3. Delivery of data for all 5 preferred SoE nutrients (BOD5 or BOD7, Total Ammonium/Ammonium, Total Phosphorus, Orthophosphate, Nitrate/Total Oxidised Nitrogen), and
4a. Delivery of hazardous substances data and especially from Preferred SoE Hazardous Substances list, or
4b. Delivery of proxy pressures data for all reported monitoring stations (if not delivered in the past years) and available time series for preferred SoE nutrients data are long at least 5 years if continuous, or 10 years if broken.
GoodGood 1. Timely data delivery to national repository and country feedback to reported data issues, and
2. Delivery of lake monitoring stations (sampling sites) with coordinates (if not delivered in the past years), and
3. Delivery of data for at least 3 of 5 preferred SoE nutrients (BOD5 or BOD7, Total Ammonium/Ammonium, Total Phosphorus, Orthophosphate, Nitrate/Total Oxidised Nitrogen)
Good Delayed delivery under WISE-SoE data collection 2010 but data provided in requested format, or
Timely data delivery, but provided data do not meet the above mentioned requirements for obtaining a higher score.
Poor No data delivery under WISE-SoE data collection 2010, no communication, or
Data could not be processed because not delivered in a requested format or not following basic quality criteria or delivered after data processing period.
European datasets Waterbase data published through EEA data service
Related indicators EEA core set of indicators: CSI 20 Nutrients in freshwater
Other water indicators on EEA website.
Data deliveries Data uploaded to the Central Data Repository

EWN3: Groundwater quality

Scoring criteria are based on data deliveries for the current year and the provision of quality data for a variety of determinands. A further criterion is the identification of groundwater bodies according to the criteria in the Technical Guidelines for Eurowaternet Implementation. Important for achieving the maximum score are the provision of preferably disaggregated data of Ammonium, Nitrates, Nitrites, Dissolved Oxygen and priority pesticides, provision of GIS polygon data of groundwater bodies, provision of monitoring stations with coordinates and their link to WFD Art. 5 groundwater bodies (if not delivered in the past years).
GoodGoodGood Timely data delivery to national repository and country feedback to reported data issues, and additionally:
1. At least three of five chemical substances data reported in disaggregated structure: Ammonium, Nitrates, Nitrites, Dissolved Oxygen and priority pesticides from Preferd SoE Hazardous Substances (Lindane, Simazine, Atrazine).
2. Monitoring stations with coordinates and their link to groundwater bodies (if not delivered in the past years)
3. GIS polygon data of groundwater bodies including the most important attribute fields mentioned in the methodology for GW body characteristics and pressure table in Data Dictionary (if not delivered up to now within WISE SoE reporting or WFD reporting)
GoodGood Timely data delivery to national repository and country feedback to reported data issues, and
1. At least two of five chemical substances data: Ammonium, Nitrates, Nitrites, Dissolved Oxygen and priority pesticides from Preferred SoE Hazardous Substances (Lindane, Simazine, Atrazine).
2a. If disaggregated data are reported, monitoring stations with coordinates and groundwater bodies including the most important attribute fields mentioned in the methodology for GW bodies table (if not delivered in the past years), or
2b. If aggregated data are reported, groundwater bodies including the most important attribute fields mentioned in the methodology for GW bodies table (aggregated data) (if not delivered in the past years)
Good Delivery under WISE-SoE data collections 2010 contains:
1. Quality data for at least one out of five chemical substances: Ammonium, Nitrates, Nitrites, Dissolved Oxygen and priority pesticides from Preferred SoE Hazardous Substances (Lindane, Simazine, Atrazine), or
2. GIS polygon data of groundwater bodies (if not delivered in the past years), or
3. Groundwater monitoring stations (sampling sites) with coordinates (if not delivered in the past years).
Poor No data delivery under WISE-SoE data collection 2010, no communication, or
Data could not be processed because not delivered in a requested format or not following basic quality criteria or delivered after data processing period.
European datasets Waterbase data published through EEA data service
Related indicators EEA core set of indicators: CSI 020 Nutrients in freshwater
Other water indicators on EEA website.
Data deliveries Data uploaded to the Central Data Repository

EWN4: Water quantity

Scoring criteria are based on data deliveries for the current year and the provision of water quantity data (water availability, abstraction and use) for a variety of parameters as described in the WISE-SoE #3 and related WQ Data Manual. Important for achieving the maximum score is the provision of spatially and temporally disaggregated regional data at River Basin District (RBD) or Sub-Unit (SU) level and at monthly scale, covering the entire country. A further criterion is the identification and provision of data for streamflow stations (daily timeseries), reservoirs and groundwater wells (monthly timeseries) achieving a representative coverage each RBD or SU. Data provided to the WISE-SoE #3 reporting will be automatically pre-filling the Eurostat Joint Questionnaire on Inland Waters (JQ IWA) and thus not required to be reported again (no double-reporting).
GoodGoodGood
  1. Timely data delivery to national repository in the requested format, and country feedback to reported data issues.
  2. At least 65 parameters are reported for the regional requested data (water balance, water availability, water use) at RBD or SU scale, for at least 75% of the RBDs or SUs of the country, and of which at least 50% are reported in monthly scale.
  3. Point data are also reported for at least 75% of the RBDs or SUs as follows:
    • At least 20 streamflow stations per RBD (or SU). At least 50% of these timeseries need to be in daily scale and the remaining in monthly scale.
    • At least 20 groundwater wells per RBD (or SU). At least 50% of these timeseries need to be in monthly scale and the remaining in seasonal or annual scale.
    • At least 5 reservoirs per RBD (or SU). At least 50% of these timeseries need to be in monthly scale and the remaining in seasonal or annual scale.
* It is understood that some of the point data many not be available for reporting due to force-majeur (i.e. security purposes for reservoirs) and in such cases (when stated) this will be considered accordingly.
GoodGood
  1. Timely data delivery to national repository in the requested format, and country feedback to reported data issues.
  2. At least 20 parameters are reported for the regional requested data (water balance, water availability, water use) at RBD or SU scale, for at least 40% of the RBDs or SUs of the country in monthly (preferable) or annual scale.
  3. Point data are also reported for at least 40% of the RBDs or SUs as follows:
    • At least 10 streamflow stations per RBD (or SU). At least 50% of these timeseries need to be in daily scale and the remaining in monthly scale.
    • At least 10 groundwater wells per RBD (or SU). At least 50% of these timeseries need to be in monthly scale and the remaining in seasonal or annual scale.
    • At least 2 reservoirs per RBD (or SU). At least 50% of these timeseries need to be in monthly scale and the remaining in seasonal or annual scale.
* It is understood that some of the point data many not be available for reporting due to force-majeur (i.e. security purposes for reservoirs) and in such cases (when stated) this will be considered accordingly.
Good
  1. Delayed data delivery under WISE-SoE data collection 2010, or
  2. Timely delivery, but the delivered data are not meeting the above mentioned requirements for obtaining a higher score.
Poor No data delivery under WISE-SoE data collection 2010, no communication.
European datasets Waterbase data published through EEA data service.
Related indicators EEA core set of indicators:
  • CSI 018 Use of freshwater resources
  • WEI Water Exploitation Index

Other water indicators on EEA website.
Data deliveries Data uploaded to the Central Data Repository
Note:
This data flow is not part of the formal set of Eionet priority data flows. The scores are provided for information only. They are not included in the overall assessment of country performance.

ME1: Marine data

Scores based on the evaluation of the data delivered by countries. It is not the intention that this data flow should require countries to make duplicate supplies of data. Any data already submitted to the Marine Conventions need not be re-supplied through the Eionet-Water process. These data will be requested directly from the Marine Conventions. Countries are asked to submit only missing or additional data.
GoodGoodGood Additionally, at least three items out of the following list have been provided and including the 2 items that support the marine CSI (hazardous substances in biota and nutrients/chlorophyll in seawater):
  • Hazardous substances in biota
  • Hazardous substances in sediment
  • Hazardous substances in seawater
  • Nutrients in sea water
  • Riverine inputs and pressure data
  • Direct discharges
  • Station characteristics
GoodGood Timely data delivery under WISE SoE collection or to Marine Conventions in 2010, data provided in the requested format and including 1 items that supports the marine CSI (hazardous substances in biota or nutrients/chlorophyll in seawater).
Good 1. Delayed data delivery under WISE SoE collection or to Marine Conventions in 2010, but data provided in the requested format, or
2. Timely data delivery that could not be processed before the data processing deadline (10/12/2010) because it was not delivered in a requested format or data do not follow basic quality criteria (even after potential corrections from the data submitter).
Poor 1. No data delivery under WISE SoE collection or to Marine Conventions in 2010, no communication, or
2. Delayed data delivery that could not be processed because data was not delivered in a requested format or data do not follow basic quality criteria (even after potential corrections from the data submitter).
European datasets Waterbase data published through EEA data service
Related indicators EEA core set of indicators:
  • CSI 021 Nutrients in transitional, coastal and marine waters
  • CSI 023 Chlorophyll in transitional, coastal and marine waters
Other coast and seas indicators on EEA website.
Data deliveries Data uploaded to the Central Data Repository

NRTO3: Near real-time ozone data

Scoring is based on provision of near real-time ozone data to EEA during the summer ozone season from April 1 to September 30 of the current year. The scoring criteria relate to participation in the near real-time data exchange, density of data provision and reliability. The reliability requirement thresholds have been raised from the thresholds applied in 2007 as data suppliers now have more experience with this data flow.
GoodGoodGood The number of active ozone measurement stations signed up in a country provide an overall statistical data coverage of 1/10000 km2. In addition, the overall reliability of the stations should be greater than 80 % in the ozone season.
GoodGood The number of active ozone measurement stations signed up in a country provide an overall statistical data coverage of 1/10000 km2. In addition, the overall reliability of the stations should be greater than 60 % in the ozone season.
Good At least one provider signed up from a country, data exchange set up and EEA records receipt of some data for active ozone measurement stations with EoI codes.
Poor Criteria not applied for this data flow.
Regular products Near real-time ozone data are published on the EEA web site
Data deliveries See the real-time ozone data statistics on this page.
Note:
This data flow is not part of the formal set of Eionet priority data flows. The scores are provided for information only. They are not included in the overall assessment of country performance.

E-PRTR1: European Pollutant Transfer Register

The criteria are based on the timeliness, use of requested reporting format and availability of assessment of completeness in the template provided.
GoodGoodGood E-PRTR data available in CDR by 31 March 2011 in the specified xml format accompanied by an assessment of completeness for the data delivered: Activities, substances, releases and/or transfers, list of facilities not yet included.
GoodGood E-PRTR data delivered in time (by 31 March 2011) in the specified xml format.
Good E-PRTR data delivered but not satisfying criteria for timeliness or reporting format.
Poor No E-PRTR data delivered.
European datasets European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register (E-PRTR) published through EEA data service.
European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register (E-PRTR) viewer.
Related indicators EEA core set of indicators:
Data deliveries Data uploaded to the Central Data Repository
Notes:
This data flow is not part of the formal set of Eionet priority data flows. The scores are provided for information only. They are not included in the overall assessment of country performance.
Due to the high number of uploads on CDR for the E-PRTR data reporting, data delivery has been defined as that dataset released on CDR for which the country has agreed the publication on the E-PRTR website with the European Commission.

WISE1: Water emission quality

Scoring criteria are based on data deliveries for the current year and the provision of quality data for a variety of sources and determinands. Important for achieving the maximum score is provision of more detailed source of emission data (if not delivered in another reporting or in the past years).
GoodGoodGood 1. At least two determinands for Nutrients and Organic Matter Emission Discharges from Point Sources (if not delivered in another reporting)
2. At least two determinands for Nutrients and Organic Matter Emission Discharges from Diffuse Sources (if not delivered in the past years)
3. At least one determinand for Hazardous substances Emission Discharges from Point Sources (if not delivered in another reporting)
4a. Emission values for Nutrients and Organic Matter Emission Discharges from Point Sources split at least for Urban and Industrial discharges, or
4b. Emission values for Hazardous Substances Emission Discharges from Point Sources split at least for E-PRTR facilities and non E-PRTR facilities (for EU members only)
5. Timely data delivery to national repository and country feedback to reported data issues
GoodGood 1. At least two determinands for Nutrients and Organic Matter Emission Discharges from Point Sources (if not delivered in another reporting)
2. At least two determinands for Nutrients and Organic Matter Emission Discharges from Diffuse Sources (if not delivered in the past years)
3. At least one determinand for Hazardous substances Emission Discharges from Point Sources (if not delivered in another reporting)
4. Timely data delivery to national repository and country feedback to reported data issues
Good 1a. One determinand for Nutrients and Organic Matter Emission Discharges from Point Sources (if not delivered in another reporting), or
1b. One determinand for Nutrients and Organic Matter Emission Discharges from Diffuse Sources (if not delivered in the past years), or
1c. One determinand for Hazardous substances Emission Discharges from Point Sources (if not delivered in another reporting)
Poor No data delivery under WISE-SoE data collection 2010, no communication, or unusable data delivery.
Regular products Waterbase data published through EEA data service
Data deliveries Data uploaded to the Central Data Repository

Note:
This data flow is not part of the formal set of Eionet priority data flows. The scores are provided for information only. They are not included in the overall assessment of country performance.