Account services

Draft evaluation of deliveries from Slovakia   (Scoring history...)

Data flow name Status Progress 2010-2011 Progress 2011-2012 Remark
AE1: LRTAP data 2012-05-20 GoodGoodGood GoodGood Partial time series (2000-2010) delivered on time in CDR. LRTAP/EMEP emission inventory status report also available.
AE1b: NEC data 2012-01-30 GoodGood GoodGood Inventory delivered on time for years 2000-2010. Projections (from 2009) provided for 2010, 2015, 2020, 2030 and 2050. Requested format not used. National inventory report provided.
AE2: UNFCCC data 2012-05-20 Good GoodGoodGood Delivery to CDR on time. CRF XML format provided. Partial national inventory report provided. Delivery on time to UNFCCC.
AE2b: EU GHG data 2012-01-30 GoodGoodGood GoodGoodGood Full time series (1990-2010) delivered on time in CDR for all gases in the criteria. CRF XML format provided. Short inventory report also provided (17 January 2012).
AQ1: EoI data 2012-01-30 GoodGoodGood GoodGoodGood Data delivered on time. Data on particulate matter available for 2010. More than 50% active stations monitoring PM10 plus monitoring of smaller particulates. Data provided for 4th Daughter Directive pollutants. Response to feedback report provided in CDR.
AQ2: Air quality questionnaire 2012-01-30 GoodGoodGood GoodGoodGood Questionnaire delivered on time in CDR. Forms 8 and 9 contain information on whether 2010 pollutant levels exceeded or did not exceed the values specified in the air quality legislation for the 11 zones and agglomerations listed in Form 2. Information provided for 4th Daughter Directive. EoI codes provided in Forms 3 and 4 for stations used in the assessment. Station type provided in Form 4. Declaration provided that boundary information has not changed from previous year.
AQ2b: Monthly and summer ozone data 2012-01-30 GoodGoodGood GoodGoodGood All monthly reports for 2011 provided on time in CDR. Full summer report delivered on time. Requested metadata provided.
CDDA1: Designated areas 2012-05-01 Poor GoodGoodGood Delivery in CDR within time limits (22/03/2012): 1148 sites reported. All sites have the required information on IUCN category designation code, size and coordinates. Boundaries are provided for 1124 sites (98%).
E-PRTR1: European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register 2012-04-22 Good GoodGoodGood Data delivery on time to CDR. Data in specified xml format. Completeness report available.
EWN1: River quality 2012-05-15 GoodGoodGood GoodGoodGood Data delivered on time and in the requested format. Monitoring stations with coordinates provided. Data for the 5 preferred SoE nutrient groups delivered. Hazardous substances data delivered. Proxy pressures data provided. Some long time series on nutrients available.
EWN2: Lake quality 2012-05-15 GoodGood Good Data delivered on time and in the requested format. Monitoring stations with coordinates provided. Data for the 5 preferred SoE nutrient groups not delivered. Hazardous substances data delivered. Proxy pressures data provided. No reply to critical QA issues on previously reported data.
EWN3: Groundwater quality 2012-05-01 GoodGoodGood GoodGoodGood Data delivered on time and in the requested format. Data for all 5 requested chemical substances provided, all in disaggregated form. Monitoring sites with coordinates and links to GW bodies provided. GIS data for GW bodies and list of GW bodies with most important attributes and pressure data provided.
EWN4: Water quantity (1) 2012-01-30 Good GoodGood Data delivered on time. Reported both regional and point data. Reported: 22 regional parameters at RBD level for 100% of the RBDs of which 100% in monthly scale. Did not report the total number of available stations.
ME1: Marine data 2012-05-15 N/A N/A Country does not have a coastline.
NRTO3: Near real-time ozone data (1) 2012-05-22 Good GoodGood Satisfactory spatial coverage and reliable data provision (60%) during the ozone season.
WISE1: Emissions to water (1) 2012-05-15 GoodGood GoodGood Data delivered on time. Nutrients and organic matter emission discharges not provided for determinands from diffuse sources and for 4 determinands from point sources that are split for urban and industrial discharges. Hazardous substances emission discharges provided for 20 determinands from point sources that are not split for E-PRTR facilities and non E-PRTR facilities.

(1) The scores are provided for information only.

Detailed critera for scoring